This year has brought so many strange art-related developments, from mysterious desert monoliths to Cookie Monster murals. And if the final square of your “Memes of 2020” bingo card was “time-traveling astronaut visiting Baby Jesus,” you are in luck. Believe it or not, this marvel comes courtesy the Vatican.
In case you missed this latest bit of news, here is everything you need to know.
Wait, what in the world are you talking about?
On the evening of December 11, two weeks before Christmas, the Vatican brought forth its annual display of its nativity scene. The tradition goes back to Pope St. John Paul II, who kicked it off in 1982.
Catholics await with bated breath the unveiling of each year’s sculptural set, usually donated by an Italian town. At the same time, the Vatican unveiled its annual Christmas tree, a 91-foot-tall spruce from Slovenia.
“The Vatican wants the Nativity scene and Christmas tree this year to be a sign of hope against COVID-19,” Rome Reports relayed at the end of October. But since its unveiling, its message of comfort has been somewhat drowned out by a wave of reaction to its unconventional nature.
So, what does this year’s look like?
Well, it’s not the usual.
The figures’ bodies are defined by simple cylinders, topped by spheres for the heads, with no limbs. There’s no traditional setting, no wooden manger, no straw on the ground, just a very minimalist empty space.
“It made me think of bowling pins with Baby Jesus as a ball,” one visitor told Reuters of the design.
Perhaps alluding to a landscape, a glowing light behind the figures makes it seem as though they’re being struck by lightning.
What attracts the most attention, however, is the figure who appears to be an astronaut, in a spacesuit, gripping the moon in his hands. There’s also a sinister-looking figure in a black helmet who many have compared—perhaps on account of the space theme—to Darth Vader from .
You don’t have to be a philistine to acknowledge that it’s… .
So, where did this display come from?
The sculptures on view are part of a larger, 52-piece set created by students and teachers of the F.A. Grue Art Institute, in the town of Castelli. Started in 1965, it took a decade to complete.
Known for its ceramics tradition, Castelli lies in Italy’s Abruzzi region. In fact, the five colors known as the “Castelli Palette” predominate in the ceramic nativity.
The St. Peter’s Diocese website points out art historical precedents for its strangely proportioned features, including in Mesopotamian sculpture. It also mentions precedents as diverse as Renaissance art, the neo-baroque, and the work of self-taught artists.
While the ceramic figures have created a sensation in this year’s display, this is not, in fact, the first time they have been seen publicly. The sculptures have even been on tour, going on display in Rome on Christmas in 1970 and later doing several gigs in the Middle East, in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and even Bethlehem, Jesus’s birthplace.
But why in the world is there an astronaut there?
Four years into the Castelli school’s work on the sculpture set, astronauts first walked on the moon, in 1969. In honor of that accomplishment, the sculptors put in their Italian Neil Armstrong.
Many have pointed out that previous Vatican displays have also included seemingly incongruous elements.
For instance, in 2016, a Maltese fishing boat appeared in the display in reference to the plight of refugees (just as America’s wall-building president was about to take office).
2017’s realist display from the town of Montevergine featured people performing acts of mercy, like feeding the destitute, visiting the incarcerated, and clothing the naked. That display, too, generated controversy, when the depiction of “clothing the naked” was considered to be so sexy as to be potential gay propaganda, with blasting it as “obscene.”
What do critics have to say about the Space Nativity?
The National Catholic Register complains of a “satanic-looking executioner—but no manger.” (Artist Fausto Cheg, one of the team that created the sculpture, has said that the executioner figure, in fact, refers to the abolition of the death penalty.)
Catholic Herald contributing editor Tim Stanley calls it “absolutely terrifying.”
A writer for the Catholic Herald calls the nativity “embarrassing,” but opines that, hey, maybe this is a way for the Church to connect with the world of today: “When the Church encounters a new culture of, say, an indigenous tribe, or a society quite foreign to European aesthetics and sensibilities,” he writes, “She will experiment with blending some of their native expressions with the Church’s patrimony as part of the work of evangelization. It is therefore fair that She also do this with modern Western culture.”
And who’s to say that’s wrong? Writer Matt Stansberry took to Twitter to quip that the nativity “by far the church’s best effort to bring me back into the fold.”
Has Pope Francis weighed in?
Yes and no.
In general, he is pro-anachronism. “It is customary to add many symbolic figures to our nativity scenes,” said Pope Francis in 2019. “Children—but adults too!—often love to add to the nativity scene other figures that have no apparent connection with the Gospel accounts. Yet, each in its own way, these fanciful additions show that in the new world inaugurated by Jesus there is room for whatever is truly human and for all God’s creatures.”
On Sunday, however, the Pope pointedly did recommend seeing the unconventional Nativity during an address. Speaking to visitors from his window overlooking Vatican Square, Francis instead twice exhorted them to visit a nearby exhibition of more than 100 nativity displays, which he said showed “how people try to use art to show how Jesus was born.”
No mention was made of poor Italian Neil Armstrong. Given the ongoing mockery of the ceramics display, the silence on the Pope’s part has been widely interpreted as a snub.
Has anyone else taken to Twitter to weigh in?
If I speak Italian and I want to know more, is there, say, a video on YouTube of an interview with one of the creators of these sculptures??